{"id":1254,"date":"2025-11-17T17:50:34","date_gmt":"2025-11-17T13:20:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/?p=1254"},"modified":"2025-11-17T17:50:38","modified_gmt":"2025-11-17T13:20:38","slug":"same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/","title":{"rendered":"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h1 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Bombay HC has refused interim relief to a same-sex couple challenging the exemption for gifts from \u201cspouse\u201d under Section 56(2)(x) of the IT Act.<\/h1>\n\n\n\n<p>The recent order of the Bombay High Court has brought significant attention to the treatment of same-sex couples under the Income-tax Act, 1961. In a case that challenges the constitutional validity of Section 56(2)(x), the Court refused to grant interim protection to a same-sex couple seeking exemption from gift tax on the ground that they should be treated as \u201cspouses\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The decision highlights a crucial gap in Indian tax law\u2014<strong>same-sex couples are not legally recognised as \u201cspouses\u201d<\/strong>, and therefore\u00a0<strong>cannot claim the <a href=\"http:\/\/caindwarka.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">gift-tax exemption available to married couples<\/a><\/strong>. This has direct implications for high-value transactions, gift-tax litigation, and income-tax notices issued under AY 2024-25 and upcoming assessment cycles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This article summarises the case, the legal issues involved, and the practical impact for taxpayers and consultants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Background of the Case<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>A same-sex couple approached the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutionality of Section 56(2)(x) of the Income-tax Act, which taxes gifts exceeding \u20b950,000 received from non-relatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The fifth proviso to Section 56(2)(x) exempts gifts received from certain \u201crelatives\u201d, including a&nbsp;<strong>\u201cspouse\u201d<\/strong>.<br>Since Indian law does not legally recognise same-sex marriage or civil unions, gifts exchanged between same-sex partners&nbsp;<strong>do not qualify<\/strong>&nbsp;for this exemption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The petitioners argued that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The exclusion is discriminatory under Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Same-sex partners should be treated as \u201cspouses\u201d for the purpose of gift-tax exemption;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Until final adjudication, they should be protected from any coercive action or tax demand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What the Bombay High Court Held<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Division Bench refused to grant interim relief, stating that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The term\u00a0<strong>\u201cspouse\u201d must be understood within existing marriage laws<\/strong>, which currently recognise only heterosexual marriages.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Court cannot expand the definition of \u201cspouse\u201d through an interim order.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Even if the petitioners succeed later,\u00a0<strong>tax paid can be refunded<\/strong>, therefore no urgent unusual protection is required at this stage.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The matter requires detailed constitutional hearing and cannot be decided hurriedly before the statutory compliance deadline.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Result:<\/strong><br><strong>Same-sex couples remain outside the exemption framework of Section 56(2)(x) of Income Tax Act 1961, and any gift received from a partner is taxable.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Legal Position Under Section 56(2)(x) \u2013 Current Status<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Gifts above \u20b950,000 received from a person\u00a0<strong>who is not a \u201crelative\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0are taxable under \u201cIncome from Other Sources\u201d.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cRelative\u201d includes\u00a0<strong>spouse, parents, siblings, lineal ascendants\/descendants<\/strong>, etc.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Since same-sex partners are\u00a0<strong>not legally recognised as spouses<\/strong>, they fall under \u201cnon-relative\u201d.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Therefore, the gift becomes taxable unless specifically exempt under another clause.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Implications for Same-Sex Couples and Taxpayers<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>1. Gifts from same-sex partners remain taxable<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Any monetary gift, immovable property, or movable property transferred between partners is taxable under Section 56(2)(x), unless a different exemption applies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>2. High risk of receiving Income-tax Notices<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Cases of unreported gifts or unexplained credit entries may attract:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Notice under\u00a0<strong>Section 142(1)<\/strong>\u00a0(seeking information),<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Notice under\u00a0<strong>Section 143(2)<\/strong>\u00a0(scrutiny),<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Notice under\u00a0<strong>Section 148<\/strong>\u00a0(income escaping assessment),<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Queries regarding mismatch under AIS\/TIS.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Given the current legal position, taxpayers in same-sex relationships must maintain strong documentation of:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Source of funds,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Gift deed,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Bank trail,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Valuation reports (if property involved).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>3. Tax planning complexities<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Without \u201cspouse\u201d status:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Tax-free transfer of funds is not possible,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Clubbing provisions do not recognise such relationships,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Estate planning becomes more compliance-heavy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>4. Possible refund later<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>If the High Court eventually rules in favour of recognition, taxpayers may seek:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Refund of gift tax paid,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Rectification under Section 154,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Relief through appellate mechanism.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>However,&nbsp;<strong>as on date, no exemption exists<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Why This Case Matters for Tax Practitioners &amp; Consultants<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This case opens an important chapter in how tax law intersects with equality rights and evolving social norms. For\u00a0<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/caalokkumar.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Income Tax Notice Consultants<\/a><\/strong>,\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/appointment.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ITR-U filing experts<\/a><\/strong>, and\u00a0<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/wealth4india.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Tax Litigation Professionals<\/a><\/strong>, the matter has immediate relevance because:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>High-value gifts between same-sex partners can trigger\u00a0<strong>SFT reporting<\/strong>, followed by\u00a0<strong>income-tax notices<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Non-disclosure may lead to penalty proceedings for misreporting or under-reporting.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Clients may seek advisory on risk mitigation, documentation, and advance tax planning.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>As per current legislation,&nbsp;<strong>no tax professional can advise exemption for gifts between same-sex partners<\/strong>, unless the law is amended or the Court issues a favourable ruling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Key Takeaways<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The\u00a0<strong>Bombay High Court has refused interim relief<\/strong>\u00a0to a same-sex couple seeking gift-tax exemption under Section 56(2)(x).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Same-sex partners are\u00a0<strong>not legally recognised as \u201cspouses\u201d<\/strong>, and therefore cannot claim tax-free gift exemption.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>All such gifts above \u20b950,000 remain\u00a0<strong>fully taxable<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Taxpayers may receive\u00a0<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/itrkendra.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Income Tax Notices<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0if such gifts are not properly disclosed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Proper documentation, compliance, and risk-based tax planning are essential.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-pullquote has-text-align-left\"><blockquote><p>Petitioners: Payio Ashiho &amp; Vivek Divan (same-sex couple)\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfultalks.net\/news\/same-sex-rights-under-tax-law-face-constitutional-test-in-bombay-hc?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">LawFul Talks+2The Indian Express+2<\/a><br>Respondents: Union of India &amp; the Income\u2011tax Department\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfultalks.net\/news\/same-sex-rights-under-tax-law-face-constitutional-test-in-bombay-hc?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">LawFul Talks+2Taxscan+2<\/a><br>Case title:\u00a0<em>\u201cPayio AshIho &amp; Anr. v. Union of India &amp; Anr., Writ Petition (L) No. 24345 of 2025\u201d<\/em>\u00a0(as per one report)\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfultalks.net\/news\/same-sex-rights-under-tax-law-face-constitutional-test-in-bombay-hc?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">LawFul Talks<\/a><br>Bench\/Judges: Justices B.P. Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.mid-day.com\/mumbai\/mumbai-news\/article\/same-sex-couple-moves-bombay-high-court-against-gift-tax-rules-23589687?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Mid-day+2The Indian Express+2<\/a><br>Provision challenged: Fifth proviso to Section 56(2)(x) of the Income\u2011tax Act, 1961 (exemption for gifts from \u201cspouse\u201d and other relatives)\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/government.economictimes.indiatimes.com\/news\/governance\/landmark-case-same-sex-couple-challenges-gift-tax-rules-in-high-court\/123329760?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ETGovernment.com+1<\/a><br>Key issue: Whether the term \u201cspouse\u201d in that proviso should include same-sex couples or if its exclusion violates Articles 14\/15 of the Constitution.\u00a0<\/p><cite><em><a href=\"http:\/\/caalokkumar.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u201cPayio AshIho &amp; Anr. v. Union of India &amp; Anr., Writ Petition (L) No. 24345 of 2025\u201d<\/a><\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><em><strong>#IncomeTax #TaxConsultant #Section56 #GiftTax #BombayHighCourt #TaxNotice #FacelessAssessment #IncomeTaxUpdate #TaxAdvisory #IndianLaw #CAinIndia #CAinDwarka #CAinDelhi #CAAlokkumar #TaxConsultant #TaxNoticeConsultant #LGBTQIA #TaxCompliance <a href=\"http:\/\/caalokkumar.com\">Income Tax Notice<\/a>, Section 56(2)(x), Gift Tax, Spouse Definition, Tax Dispute, Income Tax Litigation, Tax Compliance, Gift Tax Exemption, Same-Sex Couple Taxation.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Bombay HC has refused interim relief to a same-sex couple challenging the exemption for gifts from \u201cspouse\u201d under Section 56(2)(x) of the IT Act. The recent order of the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1255,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-income-tax-act-1961"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief - CA ALOK KUMAR<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay HC denies interim relief to a same-sex couple seeking gift tax exemption under Section 56(2)(x). Same-sex partners not recognised as \u201cspouse\u201d under Income Tax Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief - CA ALOK KUMAR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay HC denies interim relief to a same-sex couple seeking gift tax exemption under Section 56(2)(x). Same-sex partners not recognised as \u201cspouse\u201d under Income Tax Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CA ALOK KUMAR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ca.aloknandan\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ca.aloknandan\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-17T13:20:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-17T13:20:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"853\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CA ALOK KUMAR\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CA ALOK KUMAR\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"CA ALOK KUMAR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/6ea496b3e634d37b3de236ed1bfaf657\"},\"headline\":\"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-17T13:20:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-17T13:20:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/\"},\"wordCount\":927,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/6ea496b3e634d37b3de236ed1bfaf657\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Income Tax Act 1961\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/\",\"name\":\"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief - CA ALOK KUMAR\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-17T13:20:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-17T13:20:38+00:00\",\"description\":\"Bombay HC denies interim relief to a same-sex couple seeking gift tax exemption under Section 56(2)(x). Same-sex partners not recognised as \u201cspouse\u201d under Income Tax Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":853,\"caption\":\"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/\",\"name\":\"CA ALOK KUMAR\",\"description\":\"FCA,AICA,AML SPECILAIST,LLM,ERI-INCOMETAX\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/6ea496b3e634d37b3de236ed1bfaf657\"},\"alternateName\":\"CA Firm in Dwarka\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/6ea496b3e634d37b3de236ed1bfaf657\",\"name\":\"CA ALOK KUMAR\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/77835prc62484-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/77835prc62484-1.png\",\"width\":134,\"height\":100,\"caption\":\"CA ALOK KUMAR\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\"},\"description\":\"Fellow member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and Working as a Partner of most reputed CA firm name as S.K. Mehta &amp; Co\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ca.aloknandan\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/alokkrca2000\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/ca-alok-kumar-8146b915\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/author\/caalok\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief - CA ALOK KUMAR","description":"Bombay HC denies interim relief to a same-sex couple seeking gift tax exemption under Section 56(2)(x). Same-sex partners not recognised as \u201cspouse\u201d under Income Tax Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief - CA ALOK KUMAR","og_description":"Bombay HC denies interim relief to a same-sex couple seeking gift tax exemption under Section 56(2)(x). Same-sex partners not recognised as \u201cspouse\u201d under Income Tax Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/","og_site_name":"CA ALOK KUMAR","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ca.aloknandan","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ca.aloknandan","article_published_time":"2025-11-17T13:20:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-17T13:20:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":853,"url":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"CA ALOK KUMAR","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"CA ALOK KUMAR","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/"},"author":{"name":"CA ALOK KUMAR","@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/6ea496b3e634d37b3de236ed1bfaf657"},"headline":"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief","datePublished":"2025-11-17T13:20:34+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-17T13:20:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/"},"wordCount":927,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/6ea496b3e634d37b3de236ed1bfaf657"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg","articleSection":["Income Tax Act 1961"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/","url":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/","name":"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief - CA ALOK KUMAR","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg","datePublished":"2025-11-17T13:20:34+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-17T13:20:38+00:00","description":"Bombay HC denies interim relief to a same-sex couple seeking gift tax exemption under Section 56(2)(x). Same-sex partners not recognised as \u201cspouse\u201d under Income Tax Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Gift-Tax.jpeg","width":1280,"height":853,"caption":"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/same-sex-couples-not-eligible-for-gift-tax-exemption-bombay-high-court-declines-interim-relief\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Same-Sex Couples Not Eligible for Gift Tax Exemption: Bombay High Court Declines Interim Relief"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#website","url":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/","name":"CA ALOK KUMAR","description":"FCA,AICA,AML SPECILAIST,LLM,ERI-INCOMETAX","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/6ea496b3e634d37b3de236ed1bfaf657"},"alternateName":"CA Firm in Dwarka","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/6ea496b3e634d37b3de236ed1bfaf657","name":"CA ALOK KUMAR","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/77835prc62484-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/77835prc62484-1.png","width":134,"height":100,"caption":"CA ALOK KUMAR"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/"},"description":"Fellow member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and Working as a Partner of most reputed CA firm name as S.K. Mehta &amp; Co","sameAs":["https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ca.aloknandan","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/alokkrca2000\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/ca-alok-kumar-8146b915\/"],"url":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/author\/caalok\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1254"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1254\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1256,"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1254\/revisions\/1256"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/caalokkumar.com\/my-writing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}